Skip to content

Wood species

Birch pellets

Birch is the best-documented hardwood species in the sources this site relies on — with measurements of calorific value, nitrogen and bark ash. This makes it possible to show honestly how hardwood differs from softwood — and how small those differences are.

Updated:
On this page

Birch as a raw material

Birch is a common broadleaved tree, particularly important in the forests of the Baltic states. Its wood is light-coloured and relatively uniform. Both by-products of birch processing and stemwood can be used for pellet production. Both raw-material groups — chemically untreated wood-processing residues and stemwood — are allowed in class ENplus A1[1].

Birch may be the sole raw material or one component of a blend. The species is not a mandatory marking on an ENplus bag[2], so the raw-material composition has to be established with the producer or the seller.

Birch, pine and spruce in figures

The Finnish VTT study contains measurements for downy birch, pine and spruce, which makes it possible to compare a hardwood species with softwoods on the same basis.

Birch compared with pine and spruce — VTT measurements
PropertyBirchPineSpruce
Calorific value, dry basis, MJ/kgapprox. 18.6–18.719.3119.05
Calorific value at 8% moisture content, MJ/kgapprox. 16.9–17.0approx. 17.57approx. 17.33
Nitrogen, % db0.08–0.1approx. 0.05approx. 0.05
Bark ash, % db1.601.702.34–2.80

Source of the measurements: VTT Technology 272[44]; they refer to stemwood and bark, not to a specific pellet. The “at 8% moisture content” row is an editorial calculation using the formula given in the same study.

The values as received — even for birch — are above the ENplus minimum of 16.5 MJ/kg[1], although with a smaller margin. VTT attributes the advantage of coniferous species to their higher lignin and resin content[44]. The bark is an interesting detail: in these measurements, birch bark had the least ash of the three species. This does not change VTT’s general conclusion that hardwood species contain more ash than softwoods[44], nor the fact that bark always contains many times more ash than wood.

What this means in practice

Calorific value: there is a difference, but it is small

The difference between birch and pine on a dry basis is approx. 0.6–0.7 MJ/kg, or 3–4%. For comparison: if the same pellets have a moisture content of 6% instead of 9%, their net calorific value as received rises by approx. 0.6 MJ/kg — an editorial calculation using the VTT formula[44]. The moisture content of a specific batch can therefore matter as much as the species. See the article on moisture content and the calculator in the calculators section.

Nitrogen: higher, but with a margin

Birch contains roughly twice as much nitrogen as pine and spruce (0.08–0.1% versus approx. 0.05%)[44]. Nitrogen translates into nitrogen oxide emissions, which is why ENplus limits it to 0.3% in class A1[1] — clean birch wood falls well within this limit. More on the chlorine, sulphur, nitrogen page.

Where birch wood comes from

Birch is one of the main species in the Baltic states. In Latvia it is dominant on 30% of the forest area[54], in Estonia on 29.9% of the stand area — slightly more than pine[55], and in Lithuania it accounts for approx. 16% of the growing stock[56]. Birch also grows in the forests of Poland and other countries of the region. More on the Baltic market on the Baltic states page.

FAO notes that the typical values for hardwood as a group are approx. 0.3% ash and 19.0 MJ/kg on a dry, ash-free basis[45] — the VTT birch measurements fit this picture well.

How to check birch pellets

Frequently asked questions

Do birch pellets have a lower calorific value than pine pellets?

Slightly, on a dry basis: VTT gives approx. 18.6–18.7 MJ/kg for birch compared with 19.31 MJ/kg for pine — a difference of around 3–4%. A difference of 2–3 percentage points in moisture content changes the calorific value of the pellets to a similar degree.

Can birch pellets achieve class A1?

Yes. Although the nitrogen content of birch wood (0.08–0.1%) is higher than that of pine and spruce, it is well below the A1 limit (0.3%). As with any pellets, the cleanliness of the raw material, the bark content and the production process are what decide.

  1. [1]

    ENplus® ST 1001:2022 — ENplus® wood pellets – Requirements for companies (2nd edition) (opens in a new tab)

    European Pellet Council / Bioenergy Europe, DEPIapproved 18.06.2025, in force from 01.01.2026Certification schemeaccessed: 11/09/2026

    Annex A, Table 4 (threshold values) and Table 5 (raw material). The limits are the same as in the first edition; the method for determining fines has changed to ISO 5370.

  2. [2]

    ENplus® ST 1003:2022 — Usage of the ENplus® trademarks – Requirements (2nd edition) (opens in a new tab)

    European Pellet Council / Bioenergy Europe, DEPIin force from 01.01.2026Certification schemeaccessed: 11/09/2026

    Clause 7.2.3, Table 3 — mandatory markings on the bag.

  3. [44]

    Alakangas E. et al., Properties of indigenous fuels in Finland (VTT Technology 272) (opens in a new tab)

    VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland2016Scientific sourceaccessed: 11/09/2026

  4. [45]

    Krajnc N., Wood Fuels Handbook (opens in a new tab)

    FAO2015Scientific sourceaccessed: 11/09/2026

    Table 10 — typical values according to CEN/TS 14961:2010.

  5. [54]

    Latvian Forest Sector in Facts & Figures 2023 (opens in a new tab)

    Ministry of Agriculture of LatviaOfficial statisticsaccessed: 11/09/2026

  6. [55]

    Distribution and protection of forests (statistical forest inventory 2023) (opens in a new tab)

    Keskkonnaagentuur / LoodusveebOfficial statisticsaccessed: 11/09/2026

  7. [56]

This content is an editorial summary based on the documents cited. Always confirm threshold values in the current edition of the standard or certification scheme document.

Read more