Skip to content

Quality and verification

Wood pellet laboratory testing

What can be measured in wood pellets and to which standards, what a sound test report must contain — and why the result depends on who took the sample, and where.

ISO/TC 238 standards — editions current as of 11 September 2026No in-house laboratory
On this page

We do not have our own laboratory. The results we publish as “independent analysis” come from reports by external laboratories — always naming the laboratory and giving the report number and date. This page explains how to read and assess such reports.

What can be tested in wood pellets

Every parameter that appears in the ENplus classes and in ISO 17225-2[1],[11] has its own standardised test method. These methods are developed by the technical committee ISO/TC 238 “Solid biofuels”, and their current editions are published in the committee’s catalogue[14]. This means an ash result from a laboratory in Poland can be compared with one from Austria — provided both were determined using the same method and reported on the same basis.

In practice, pellet testing falls into three groups:

  • Physical properties — dimensions, bulk density, particle density, mechanical durability, fines. They tell you how the pellets will cope with transport and how they will behave in the auger.
  • Fuel properties — moisture content, ash, calorific value, ash melting behaviour. They tell you how much energy you are buying and how much work the boiler will need.
  • Chemical composition — nitrogen, sulphur, chlorine, major elements and heavy metals. They tell you about emissions, corrosion and the purity of the raw material.

Parameters and test methods

The table pairs each parameter with its method standard (current edition), the sample basis on which the result is usually reported and what the result tells the buyer. You will find the class limit values in the certificates section.

Wood pellet parameters and test methods under ISO/TC 238 standards
ParameterMethod (standard)Sample basisWhat the result tells you
Moisture contentISO 18134-1:2022 (reference method), ISO 18134-2:2024 (simplified method), ISO 18134-3:2023 (general analysis sample)[15]as receivedHow much water the fuel contains. Water provides no energy, and evaporating it consumes energy. Part 3 is used to convert other results to a dry basis.
Ash contentISO 18122:2022[16]dry basisHow much non-combustible residue is left after burning. A raised ash content often points to bark or mineral contamination.
Gross calorific value (GCV) and net calorific value (NCV)ISO 18125:2017[17]dry basis and/or as receivedHow much energy a kilogram of fuel contains. What matters to the buyer is the net calorific value as received, because that is what the boiler actually uses.
Bulk densityISO 17828:2025[20]as receivedThe weight of a cubic metre of loose pellets — important for the capacity of the hopper and the store.
Mechanical durabilityISO 17831-1:2025[18]as receivedHow well the pellets resist abrasion in transport and in the auger. Low durability means more dust in the bag and in the hopper.
Fines (< 3.15 mm)ISO 5370:2023 (replaced the withdrawn ISO 18846:2016)[19]as receivedThe proportion of dust and fragments in the batch tested. The result depends on where the sample was taken — at the plant or after transport.
Length and diameterISO 17829:2025[21]as receivedWhether the pellets suit the burner and the auger; the share of short and overlong pellets.
Particle densityISO 18847:2024[27]as receivedHow tightly an individual pellet is compressed. ENplus requires the value to be stated, without a limit.
Nitrogen (N)ISO 16948:2015 (C, H, N)[22]dry basisAffects nitrogen oxide emissions. A result clearly above what is typical for clean wood points to admixtures of other raw materials.
Sulphur (S) and chlorine (Cl)ISO 16994:2026 (replaced ISO 16994:2016)[23]dry basisElements responsible for corrosion and emissions. Clean wood contains them only in very small amounts.
Ash melting behaviour (incl. deformation temperature DT)ISO 21404:2020[24]ash prepared at 815 °CThe temperature at which the ash softens and starts to form clinker in the burner.
Major elements (Al, Ca, Fe, Mg, P, K, Si, Na, Ti)ISO 16967:2015[25]dry basisAsh composition — helps explain a tendency to form clinker and detect mineral contamination (e.g. silicon from sand).
Trace elements / heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, Zn)ISO 16968:2015[25]dry basisWhether the raw material contained painted or impregnated wood, or other contaminants.

Sample basis as required by ENplus ST 1001:2022 (Table 4). Method standards are paid documents; the editions were confirmed in the ISO/TC 238 catalogue.

A few changes to the standards are worth knowing about when reading older reports: fines are now determined according to ISO 5370:2023, which replaced ISO 18846, and sulphur and chlorine according to ISO 16994:2026 instead of the 2016 edition. Ash melting behaviour is covered by ISO 21404:2020, which replaced CEN/TS 15370-1:2006[19],[23],[24]. Older standard numbers in a report do not mean it is wrong — but they do suggest that the analysis is not recent or that the laboratory has not updated its methods.

ENplus requires the ash melting report to state all the characteristic temperatures listed in ISO 21404, and the ash for this test is prepared at 815 °C[1].

Sampling — half of a result’s credibility

A laboratory tests what it receives. A result is exactly as representative as the sample. That is why there are separate standards for sampling and sample preparation for biofuels: ISO 18135:2017 (sampling), ISO 21945:2020 (a simplified method for small-scale applications) and ISO 14780:2017 with its 2019 amendment (sample preparation)[26].

Who took the sample?

This question matters more than the accreditation number. We distinguish between three situations:

  • Sample taken by an independent party (an inspector, the laboratory, the buyer) from a defined batch, following a set procedure — the highest credibility.
  • Sample bought on the market — a bag from a wholesaler or a shop. It shows what actually reaches the customer, but a single bag is not necessarily representative of the whole production.
  • Sample supplied by the producer — the report may be entirely sound, but we do not know whether the sample came from a typical batch. We label such results as source: producer’s declaration until they are confirmed by analysis of an independently taken sample.

Where was the sample taken?

Some parameters change along the way. ENplus specifies the measuring points: mechanical durability is determined when the means of transport is loaded at the plant, fines in bulk pellets at the factory gate or when loading for end customers, and fines in bags when the bags are filled[1]. A bag that has travelled several hundred kilometres and been reloaded several times may contain more dust than on the day it was packed. A result obtained from the market is therefore not directly comparable with a limit measured at the producer’s site — although for the buyer it is just as important.

What a professional test report must contain

The list below sets out our editorial criteria: without these elements, we do not treat a document as a complete source of data on a product. If a seller shows “test results” as a small table in an offer, ask for the full report.

Laboratory name and addressFull details of the laboratory that carried out the analysis — not just of the company that commissioned it.
Accreditation and its numberThe ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation number and an indication of which results fall within the scope of accreditation.
Report number and dateA unique number that allows the report to be confirmed with the laboratory; the date of issue.
Sample identificationProduct name, producer, diameter, batch number or serial number from the bag, description of the packaging.
Sampling informationWho took the sample, when, where and following which procedure — or a note that the sample was supplied by the client.
Dates of receipt and testingThese show whether the result relates to current production.
Methods with standard numbersThe method standard for each parameter, ideally with its year of publication (e.g. ISO 18122:2022).
Results with units and sample basisEvery result with its unit and an indication of whether it is as received or on a dry basis.
Measurement uncertaintyIf the laboratory states it — useful when a result is close to a class limit.
Signature and authorisationThe person who approved the report; the report complete, with no pages removed.

Laboratory accreditation: ISO/IEC 17025

The competence of testing laboratories is covered by ISO/IEC 17025 (International standard setting out requirements for the competence, impartiality and consistent operation of testing and calibration laboratories.). Accreditation to this standard is granted by a national accreditation body — in Poland, the Polish Centre for Accreditation (Polskie Centrum Akredytacji)Data require verification: No source in the site’s source register. The ENplus scheme requires testing bodies involved in certification to hold ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation under the EA/ILAC agreements[8].

The key word is scope. Accreditation does not cover “the whole laboratory”, only the specific methods listed in its scope. A laboratory may be accredited for determining ash and moisture content yet test mechanical durability using a non-accredited method. So:

  • ask for the accreditation number and check the scope in the accreditation body’s register;
  • compare the standard numbers in the scope with the methods in the report;
  • check whether results obtained with accredited methods are marked as such in the report.

A lack of accreditation does not mean a result is bad — scientific research and internal quality control are often carried out rigorously without it. It does mean, however, that the laboratory’s competence has not been confirmed by an independent party.

Who tests solid biofuels

Pellets and other solid biofuels are tested by several types of organisation. Each has a different role and a different value as a source of information:

Types of organisation that test wood pellets
Type of organisationTypical roleWhat to look out for
Accredited commercial laboratoriesTesting commissioned by producers, traders and buyersA scope of accreditation that covers methods for solid biofuels
Research institutes and universitiesScientific research, expert opinions, method development; some also have accredited laboratoriesWhether a given result comes from an accredited method or from research work
Testing bodies recognised under ENplusTesting samples as part of ENplus certificationCurrent list on the ENplus conformity assessment bodies page[8]
Laboratories of certification and inspection bodiesTesting linked to audits and production inspectionsThe result relates to a sample taken during an inspection
Producers’ in-house laboratoriesRoutine quality control of raw material and productionValuable for the producer; for the buyer it counts as source: producer’s declaration

Internal control is part of the requirements of some schemes — DINplus provides for mandatory internal quality control alongside the annual external inspection[28]. We do not name laboratories here; verified organisations will be published in the list below.

How to read results against class limits

A result complies with a requirement if the value reported by the laboratory is within the limit — as stated in the note to the ENplus table of limit values[1]. Before you compare a result with a limit, check three things:

  1. The sample basis. Ash, nitrogen, sulphur and chlorine are compared on a dry basis; moisture content, calorific value, durability and fines as received.
  2. The unit. Calorific value may be given in MJ/kg or kWh/kg (16.5 MJ/kg = 4.6 kWh/kg). Heavy metals are given in mg/kg, other constituents as a percentage by mass.
  3. The class and diameter. The ash limit is 0.70% for A1 and 1.20% for A2. A result of 0.9% falls within A2 but not within A1.

Dry basis vs as received — an example

The net calorific value as received is calculated from the dry-basis value using a formula that accounts for the mass of water and the heat needed to evaporate it: Qar = Qd × (100 − M)/100 − 0.02443 × M, where M is the moisture content in per cent[44],[17]. Pellets with 18.9 MJ/kg on a dry basis and 8% moisture content therefore have 18.9 × 0.92 − 0.02443 × 8 ≈ 17.19 MJ/kg (4.78 kWh/kg) as received. The same mechanism works the other way round for ash: 0.70% on a dry basis corresponds, at 8% moisture content, to around 0.64% as received. A result without a stated basis can therefore look better than it really is.

You can do your own conversions with our calculators.

Compliance is not everything

Two A1-compliant pellets can differ markedly: ash contents of 0.3% and 0.7% mean around 3 kg and 7 kg of ash respectively per tonne of dry fuel. That is why, beyond compliance, we look at where the result sits within the class and at consistency across successive batches — details in our methodology.

Scope of testing, time and cost

We do not quote prices — they depend on the laboratory, the country, the number of determinations and the turnaround time. The scope of the analysis has the greatest effect on cost and waiting time. Practical options:

  • Basic set — moisture content, ash, calorific value, mechanical durability, fines. Enough to compare offers and check deliveries.
  • Full set for a class — every parameter in the table of limit values, including nitrogen, sulphur, chlorine, ash melting behaviour and heavy metals. Needed when you want to confirm compliance with class A1.
  • Diagnostic tests — ash composition (major elements), when clinker appears in the boiler even though the basic parameters look fine.

Before commissioning an analysis, ask the laboratory how much sample it needs, how it should be packed, the turnaround time and which methods are covered by its accreditation. If the result may be used in a dispute with a supplier, agree on the sampling procedure in advance and keep a sealed arbitration sample.

List of laboratories

The list will cover laboratories and testing organisations that test wood pellets in Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Germany and other EU countries — added only once their accreditation and its scope have been checked.

Poland

0verified

in preparation

Czech Republic

0verified

in preparation

Slovakia

0verified

in preparation

Germany

0verified

in preparation

Other EU countries

0verified

in preparation

Frequently asked questions

Can a producer test its own pellets?

Yes, and good producers do — in-house quality control makes it possible to detect problems with the raw material or the press quickly. A result from the plant’s own laboratory is nevertheless a producer’s declaration. We treat as an independent source a report from an external laboratory whose accreditation covers the methods used, with the sampling described.

Why is the calorific value in the report higher than on the bag?

Most often the report gives it on a dry basis, while the bag gives it as received — that is, taking moisture into account. At 8% moisture content, pellets with 18.9 MJ/kg on a dry basis have around 17.2 MJ/kg as received. Always compare values on the same basis.

Is one analysis enough to assess a producer?

No. A report describes one sample from one batch. What tells you about a producer is how consistent the results are across successive deliveries — which is why, for wholesale purchases, it is worth requiring a report for every batch and comparing the results over time.

  1. [1]

    ENplus® ST 1001:2022 — ENplus® wood pellets – Requirements for companies (2nd edition) (opens in a new tab)

    European Pellet Council / Bioenergy Europe, DEPIapproved 18.06.2025, in force from 01.01.2026Certification schemeaccessed: 11/09/2026

    Annex A, Table 4 (threshold values) and Table 5 (raw material). The limits are the same as in the first edition; the method for determining fines has changed to ISO 5370.

  2. [8]

    ENplus® — conformity assessment bodies (certification and testing) (opens in a new tab)

    European Pellet CouncilRegisteraccessed: 11/09/2026

    Certification bodies: ISO/IEC 17065 accreditation; testing bodies: ISO/IEC 17025.

  3. [11]

    ISO 17225-2:2021 Solid biofuels — Fuel specifications and classes — Part 2: Graded wood pellets (opens in a new tab)

    ISO / TC 2382nd edition, 2021-05Standard paid documentaccessed: 11/09/2026

    Edition and scope of changes confirmed in the official preview of the standard. Detailed ISO values were compared with the FDIS draft — see the separate source.

  4. [14]

    ISO/TC 238 Solid biofuels — catalogue of published standards (opens in a new tab)

    ISOStandardaccessed: 11/09/2026

    Current editions of the test method standards for solid biofuels.

  5. [15]
  6. [16]
  7. [17]
  8. [18]
  9. [19]

    ISO 5370:2023 Solid biofuels — Determination of fines content in pellets (opens in a new tab)

    ISO / TC 238Standard paid documentaccessed: 11/09/2026

    Replaced the withdrawn ISO 18846:2016.

  10. [20]
  11. [21]
  12. [22]
  13. [23]
  14. [24]

    ISO 21404:2020 Solid biofuels — Determination of ash melting behaviour (opens in a new tab)

    ISO / TC 238Standard paid documentaccessed: 11/09/2026

    Replaced CEN/TS 15370-1:2006.

  15. [25]
  16. [26]
  17. [27]
  18. [28]

    DINplus — certification of class A1 wood pellets (scheme description) (opens in a new tab)

    Holzforschung AustriaCertification schemeaccessed: 11/09/2026

    DINplus is a DIN CERTCO (TÜV Rheinland group) certification for class A1 according to DIN EN ISO 17225-2, with annual inspection and internal control.

  19. [44]

    Alakangas E. et al., Properties of indigenous fuels in Finland (VTT Technology 272) (opens in a new tab)

    VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland2016Scientific sourceaccessed: 11/09/2026

  20. [47]

    Drobniak A. et al., Quality assessment of biomass pellets available on the market; example from Poland (opens in a new tab)

    Environmental Science and Pollution Research 31:33942–339592024Scientific sourceaccessed: 11/09/2026

    30 wood pellet samples from the Polish market; 10 did not meet the requirements for durability and/or fines.

This content is an editorial summary based on the documents cited. Always confirm threshold values in the current edition of the standard or certification scheme document.

Read more