- Home
- Knowledge base
- Wood species
Wood species
Spruce pellets
Spruce is one of the main species in Central European forests and a common raw material for pellets from the Czech Republic, Austria and Germany. Its wood has good fuel properties — but the quality of a specific pellet is decided by something other than the name of the species.
On this page
Spruce as a raw material
Norway spruce is a coniferous tree that for decades was the main commercial species in many Central European countries. Large volumes of its wood go to sawmills, and spruce sawdust and shavings are a natural raw material for pellet producers in the region. Spruce pellets are therefore usually made from wood-processing residues — group 1.2.1 in the ISO 17225-1 classification — or from stemwood (1.1.3). Both groups are allowed in the highest ENplus class, A1[1].
It is worth saying straight away what “spruce pellets” does not mean. It is not a quality class or a certificate. The wood species is not one of the mandatory markings on an ENplus bag[2], so the term “spruce” is commercial information from the producer or the seller.
What the data say
Among the sources this site relies on, the best-documented data on spruce wood come from a Finnish VTT study. Below we set them against the ENplus A1 requirements.
| Property | Spruce (VTT) | ENplus A1 |
|---|---|---|
| Calorific value of stemwood, dry basis | 19.05 MJ/kg | — |
| Calorific value at 8% moisture content (calculated) | approx. 17.33 MJ/kg | ≥ 16.5 MJ/kg |
| Nitrogen, dry basis | approx. 0.05% | ≤ 0.3% |
| Ash of spruce bark, dry basis | 2.34–2.80% | ≤ 0.70% (whole pellet) |
| Ash deformation temperature of spruce bark | 1405 °C | ≥ 1200 °C (whole pellet) |
The VTT data refer to wood and bark, not to a specific pellet[44]. The value as received is an editorial calculation using the formula given by VTT (conversion from dry basis at a moisture content of 8%). Limits according to ENplus ST 1001[1].
The conclusion is simple: clean spruce wood is a good raw material. VTT states that debarked stemwood usually has 0.3–0.7% ash, and that the higher calorific value of coniferous species results from their lignin and resin content[44]. Spruce bark, however, contains several times more ash than the wood — so the result for a specific pellet depends above all on how much bark went into the raw material. According to FAO, the typical range for softwood bark is 2–6%[45].
In the VTT data, the calorific value of spruce is slightly lower than that of pine (19.31 MJ/kg) and slightly higher than that of birch (approx. 18.6–18.7 MJ/kg)[44]. Differences of 1–4% are smaller than the effect of a few percentage points of moisture. We show this in the article on combustion differences and on the calorific value page.
Where spruce wood comes from
Spruce accounts for a large share of the region’s forests, but in many countries that share is clearly falling:
- Czech Republic — spruce covers 40.3% of forests (previously 42.9%)[51].
- Austria — approx. 49% of commercial forests, compared with over 56% in 1986–1990[58].
- Germany — 21% of the forest area; since the 2012 inventory, the area of spruce stands has fallen by 17% as a result of storms, the 2018–2021 droughts and bark beetle[57].
- Slovakia — 20.9% of forests; the share of conifers is falling, mainly because of damage to spruce stands[50].
- Latvia and Estonia — spruce is the dominant species on 19% and 18.2% of the stand area respectively[54],[55].
More on individual countries on the pages for the Czech Republic, Germany and Austria, Slovakia and the Baltic states.
Bark beetle wood — is it a problem?
In recent years, the spruce forests of Central Europe have suffered from drought and bark beetle outbreaks (Insects (mainly the European spruce bark beetle) that colonise weakened spruce trees under the bark. Mass outbreaks force large-scale sanitary felling.). In the Czech Republic, total timber harvesting rose from 16.16 million m³ in 2015 to 35.75 million m³ in 2020, of which 34.49 million m³ was softwood. In 2024 the harvest was 17.80 million m³, of which approx. 45% was salvage felling; biotic damage — almost exclusively bark beetle on spruce — accounted for 2.4 million m³[51]. In Slovakia, insects damaged 3.54 million m³ of wood in 2024[50].
Does this mean poorer pellets? Not necessarily. Spruce attacked by bark beetle and harvested in time is still stemwood. ENplus does not exclude wood from sanitary felling — it does, however, exclude raw material that is rotten, contaminated or contains a large amount of bark[1]. The risk therefore arises when the wood has stood in the forest for a long time and started to decay, when it is processed without debarking, or when it picks up sand and soil during harvesting and storage.
How to check spruce pellets
- Ash. The best indicator of the bark and contamination content. For A1, the limit is 0.70% on a dry basis[1] — more on the ash page.
- Ash deformation temperature. Shows the risk of clinker; A1 requires at least 1200 °C[1]. See ash melting temperature.
- Mechanical durability and fines. These depend on the process, not the species — see mechanical durability.
- Certificate. Check it in the ENplus register, not on a copy of the document — how to do it.
Frequently asked questions
Are spruce pellets better than pine pellets?
This cannot be determined from the species. In the VTT data, the calorific value of dry spruce wood (19.05 MJ/kg) is actually slightly lower than that of pine (19.31 MJ/kg), but this difference is smaller than the influence of moisture content, bark and the production process. Compare the test results of specific batches.
Are pellets made from bark beetle wood worse?
Not necessarily. Wood from sanitary felling is often sound stemwood. The risk increases when the raw material has started to decay or is processed with its bark on — ENplus excludes raw material that is rotten or contains a large amount of bark. The test results, especially for ash, are what decide.
How can I recognise spruce pellets?
It cannot be done reliably by eye — other species are light-coloured too. The species is not a mandatory marking on an ENplus bag, so the information has to come from the producer or the seller.
Sources and references
Full list of sources and editorial policy- [1]
European Pellet Council / Bioenergy Europe, DEPIapproved 18.06.2025, in force from 01.01.2026Certification schemeaccessed: 11/09/2026
Annex A, Table 4 (threshold values) and Table 5 (raw material). The limits are the same as in the first edition; the method for determining fines has changed to ISO 5370.
- [2]
European Pellet Council / Bioenergy Europe, DEPIin force from 01.01.2026Certification schemeaccessed: 11/09/2026
Clause 7.2.3, Table 3 — mandatory markings on the bag.
- [44]
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland2016Scientific sourceaccessed: 11/09/2026
- [45]
Krajnc N., Wood Fuels Handbook (opens in a new tab)
FAO2015Scientific sourceaccessed: 11/09/2026
Table 10 — typical values according to CEN/TS 14961:2010.
- [50]
Správa o lesnom hospodárstve v SR za rok 2024 (Zelená správa) (opens in a new tab)
MPRV SR / Národné lesnícke centrumadopted 01.10.2025Official statisticsaccessed: 11/09/2026
- [51]
Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství ČR v roce 2024 (opens in a new tab)
Ministerstvo zemědělství ČROfficial statisticsaccessed: 11/09/2026
- [54]
Latvian Forest Sector in Facts & Figures 2023 (opens in a new tab)
Ministry of Agriculture of LatviaOfficial statisticsaccessed: 11/09/2026
- [55]
Distribution and protection of forests (statistical forest inventory 2023) (opens in a new tab)
Keskkonnaagentuur / LoodusveebOfficial statisticsaccessed: 11/09/2026
- [57]
Der Wald in Deutschland — Ausgewählte Ergebnisse der vierten Bundeswaldinventur (opens in a new tab)
BMEL / Thünen-Institut10.2024Official statisticsaccessed: 11/09/2026
- [58]
Österreichische Waldinventur — results (press release) (opens in a new tab)
BFW — Bundesforschungszentrum für Wald20.07.2022Official statisticsaccessed: 11/09/2026
This content is an editorial summary based on the documents cited. Always confirm threshold values in the current edition of the standard or certification scheme document.
Read more