Skip to content

Types of wood pellets

Softwood pellets

Pine and spruce dominate the forests of Poland and its neighbours, so softwood is the natural raw material for local sawmills and pellet producers. It has some real advantages, but the “softwood” label on its own guarantees nothing.

Updated:
On this page

What softwood pellets are

Softwood pellets are made from the wood of coniferous trees — in Central Europe mainly pine and spruce. The typical raw material is sawdust and shavings from sawmills processing softwood. Quality standards do not treat softwood pellets as a separate category: ENplus and the ISO standards describe the raw material by its origin (e.g. stemwood or wood-processing residues — codes according to ISO 17225-1), not by species[1],[13]. Nor is the wood species one of the mandatory markings on an ENplus bag[2].

“Softwood” is therefore commercial information, not a quality class. Even so, softwood has several typical characteristics worth knowing — as long as we remember how much bark, contamination and the process can change them.

Softwood properties in figures

The data below describe the wood, not a specific pellet. They do, however, show the starting point from which the producer works.

Softwood — typical and measured values from the literature
PropertyValueSource
Ash, softwood (typical)0.3% (0.2–0.5%) dbFAO
Ash, debarked pine sawdust0.08% dbVTT
Ash, softwood bark (typical)4% (2–6%) dbFAO
Calorific value, softwood19.2 (18.8–19.8) MJ/kg dafFAO
Calorific value, pine / spruce (stemwood)19.31 / 19.05 MJ/kg dbVTT
Nitrogen, pine and spruceapprox. 0.05% dbVTT
Sulphur, softwood stemwood0.0116% dbVTT
Chlorine, debarked pine sawdustbelow 0.005% dbVTT

FAO values are typical values according to CEN/TS 14961:2010[45]; VTT values are Finnish measurements of stemwood and sawdust[44]. “daf” — dry, ash-free basis; “db” — dry basis. Results for a specific pellet may differ significantly.

For comparison: ENplus A1 allows up to 0.70% ash, 0.3% nitrogen, 0.04% sulphur and 0.02% chlorine (dry basis)[1]. Clean softwood falls well within these limits. VTT points out that the higher calorific value of coniferous species results from their higher content of lignin (A natural polymer in the cell walls of wood; in the pellet it acts as a natural binder.) and resins[44].

Advantages and limitations

What speaks for softwood pellets

  • Low ash in clean raw material. Debarked softwood sawdust is one of the cleanest raw materials for pellet production — an example from the VTT data is 0.08% ash for pine sawdust[44].
  • A slightly higher calorific value per kilogram. The difference compared with hardwood is, however, only a few per cent: VTT gives 19.31 MJ/kg for pine and approx. 18.6–18.7 MJ/kg for birch (dry basis)[44].
  • Little nitrogen. Pine and spruce contain approx. 0.05% nitrogen, less than birch (0.08–0.1%)[44].

What the “softwood” label does not guarantee

  • Low ash when there is bark in the raw material. Softwood bark typically has approx. 4% ash[45] — even a small admixture quickly raises the result. More in the article on raw material quality.
  • A high ash melting temperature. In the VTT data, the ash deformation temperature of pine sawdust was 1150 °C[44], whereas ENplus A1 requires at least 1200 °C[1]. The sample preparation conditions in those studies may have differed from the ENplus procedure (ash prepared at 815 °C), so the figures should not be compared directly — but the example shows that “softwood” does not automatically mean “no clinker”. Testing according to ISO 21404 is what decides[24].
  • Durability and low fines. These parameters depend mainly on the production process — see how wood pellets are made.

Where softwood raw material comes from

In Poland, coniferous stands dominate on 68.8% of the forest area, and pine covers 59.1% of all forests[48],[49]. In the Czech Republic, conifers make up 54.9% of forests, including spruce at 40.3%[51]; in Austria, spruce accounts for approx. 49% of commercial forests[58]; and in Germany, pine and spruce cover 22% and 21% of the forest area respectively[57]. It is no surprise that softwood is the main raw material of sawmills in the region, and therefore also the source of sawdust for pellet production.

The species mix is changing, however. In Poland, since 2005–2009 the share of pine has fallen by 1.3 percentage points and that of spruce by 1.5 points, while the share of broadleaved species has grown[48],[49]. In Germany, the area of spruce stands has decreased by 17% since the 2012 inventory[57]. Details for individual countries are in the wood pellets by country section.

How to assess a specific product

  1. Check the class and the certificate — and verify it in the register, not on a copy (see how to do it).
  2. Ask for batch test results: ash, moisture content, net calorific value as received, mechanical durability and ash deformation temperature.
  3. Ask about the raw material: sawmill sawdust or roundwood, with or without bark.
  4. If you are torn between softwood and hardwood pellets, read our comparison and the article on combustion differences.

Frequently asked questions

Are softwood pellets better than hardwood pellets?

Not by definition. Clean softwood usually has slightly lower ash and a slightly higher calorific value on a dry basis than hardwood, but the differences are small. Far more depends on the bark content, the cleanliness of the raw material, moisture content and the production process. The test results for the specific batch are what decide.

Which species are softwood pellets made from?

In Central Europe, mainly pine and spruce, because these dominate the region’s coniferous forests. The species is not a mandatory marking on the bag, so it is worth asking the seller.

Does resin from softwood pellets clog the burner?

We have found no data to confirm this. Resin is a combustible part of the wood and raises its calorific value. Deposits in the burner are most often ash and clinker, or the result of incomplete combustion. We cover this in more detail in the article on resin in wood pellets.

  1. [1]

    ENplus® ST 1001:2022 — ENplus® wood pellets – Requirements for companies (2nd edition) (opens in a new tab)

    European Pellet Council / Bioenergy Europe, DEPIapproved 18.06.2025, in force from 01.01.2026Certification schemeaccessed: 11/09/2026

    Annex A, Table 4 (threshold values) and Table 5 (raw material). The limits are the same as in the first edition; the method for determining fines has changed to ISO 5370.

  2. [2]

    ENplus® ST 1003:2022 — Usage of the ENplus® trademarks – Requirements (2nd edition) (opens in a new tab)

    European Pellet Council / Bioenergy Europe, DEPIin force from 01.01.2026Certification schemeaccessed: 11/09/2026

    Clause 7.2.3, Table 3 — mandatory markings on the bag.

  3. [13]

    ISO 17225-1:2021 Solid biofuels — Fuel specifications and classes — Part 1: General requirements (opens in a new tab)

    ISO / TC 2382021Standard paid documentaccessed: 11/09/2026

    Classification of raw-material origin (e.g. 1.1.3 stemwood, 1.2.1 wood-processing industry residues).

  4. [24]

    ISO 21404:2020 Solid biofuels — Determination of ash melting behaviour (opens in a new tab)

    ISO / TC 238Standard paid documentaccessed: 11/09/2026

    Replaced CEN/TS 15370-1:2006.

  5. [44]

    Alakangas E. et al., Properties of indigenous fuels in Finland (VTT Technology 272) (opens in a new tab)

    VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland2016Scientific sourceaccessed: 11/09/2026

  6. [45]

    Krajnc N., Wood Fuels Handbook (opens in a new tab)

    FAO2015Scientific sourceaccessed: 11/09/2026

    Table 10 — typical values according to CEN/TS 14961:2010.

  7. [48]

    Leśnictwo w 2024 r. [Forestry in 2024] (opens in a new tab)

    Główny Urząd Statystyczny30.06.2025Official statisticsaccessed: 11/09/2026

  8. [49]
  9. [51]

    Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství ČR v roce 2024 (opens in a new tab)

    Ministerstvo zemědělství ČROfficial statisticsaccessed: 11/09/2026

  10. [57]

    Der Wald in Deutschland — Ausgewählte Ergebnisse der vierten Bundeswaldinventur (opens in a new tab)

    BMEL / Thünen-Institut10.2024Official statisticsaccessed: 11/09/2026

  11. [58]

    Österreichische Waldinventur — results (press release) (opens in a new tab)

    BFW — Bundesforschungszentrum für Wald20.07.2022Official statisticsaccessed: 11/09/2026

This content is an editorial summary based on the documents cited. Always confirm threshold values in the current edition of the standard or certification scheme document.

Read more